Farath’s Bi‑Weekly Code Security Brief #2

Jan 20 to Feb 2, 2026

What Happened This Fortnight

January 2026 opened with a bang—three actively exploited zero-days and two CVSS 10.0 flaws. The narrative: enterprise infrastructure (Cisco, Windows, Fortinet) remains the soft target, while AI/automation frameworks (n8n, Chainlit) are the new frontier for attackers hunting lateral movement and credential theft. Microsoft’s January Patch Tuesday delivered 115 vulnerabilities with 8 critical RCEs—but that’s table stakes. The real news? Malware like AquaShell and AquaTunnel are now baked into n8n post-exploitation chains, ransomware groups breached ASRock firmware (509 GB of hardware schematics), and Cisco’s Unified Communications went from “trusted voice infrastructure” to active-exploit target in 24 hours. For DevSecOps teams, the pattern is clear: input validation failures, authentication bypasses in management interfaces, and AI frameworks with inherited web-app vulns are the new attack chain.

---

CVE-2026-21858 “Ni8mare” — n8n Unauthenticated RCE (CVSS 10.0)

n8n, the open-source workflow automation platform beloved by DevOps teams for CI/CD orchestration, harbors a critical pre-authentication remote code execution flaw. An unauthenticated attacker can weaponize a webhook endpoint to reference arbitrary files on disk, extract JWT secrets, forge admin sessions, and inject expressions that execute arbitrary Node.js code. Post-exploitation telemetry shows attackers deploying AquaShell (Python backdoor), AquaTunnel SSH tunneling, and AquaPurge log obfuscation—sometimes dormant for 45+ days before lateral movement to domain controllers. For DevSecOps: if n8n sits in your CI/CD pipeline or connects to cloud accounts, a successful exploit chains to your entire infrastructure inventory.

How this shows up in SAST/SCA/DAST/IAST

• SCA: Node.js dependency trees and container image scans should flag n8n versions < 1.121.0; map all instances running vulnerable versions to asset inventory.

• DAST: External scanning of /webhook endpoints reveals weak authentication or missing Content-Type validation; craft payloads referencing /etc/passwd or .env to test file disclosure.

• IAST: Instrument n8n service QA runs; trace data flows through expression injection points (process.mainModule.require, child_process.execSync); detect when user input reaches dangerous Node.js APIs.

Remediation for Monday

1. Upgrade immediately to n8n 1.121.0 or higher; treat versions < 1.121.0 as “actively compromised” until proven otherwise.

2. Rotate all credentials — database passwords, cloud API keys, OAuth tokens, SSH keys—every secret reachable from n8n.

3. Audit execution logs (Jan 6–Feb 02) for workflows containing process.mainModule.require, child_process, execSync, or suspicious file access patterns; escalate to SIEM/SOC.

4. Network gating: Place n8n behind authentication proxy, restrict webhook endpoints to internal networks only, disable direct internet access.

---

CVE-2026-20045 — Cisco Unified Communications Manager RCE (CVSS 8.2, Actively Exploited)

Cisco’s enterprise voice backbone—Unified Communications Manager, Unity Connection, and Webex Calling Dedicated Instance—suffers from improper HTTP input validation in the web management interface. Attackers inject shell metacharacters into configuration parameters; commands execute as root. No authentication required. CISA added it to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities within 24 hours. For DevSecOps, the blast radius includes every organization running internal Cisco UC for voice, messaging, and conferencing—often sitting on-prem behind firewalls but still vulnerable if management interfaces are exposed (HTTPS on port 8443, common default).

How this shows up in SAST/SCA/DAST/IAST

• DAST: Scan exposed Cisco UC management interfaces (identify via banner grabbing on 8443/TCP); inject shell metacharacters (; , | , &) into HTTP parameters to detect command injection; successful injection = root RCE.

• IAST: If you run UC in test environments, instrument the application; monitor HTTP request handlers for unsanitized input passed to system shell functions (execve, popen, system).

• SCA: Map Cisco UC product versions and patch levels; confirm deployment artifact contains latest fix; check for outdated TLS/SSH components.

Remediation for Monday

1. Patch immediately: Apply Cisco security updates for Unified CM, Unified CM SME, IM & Presence, Unity Connection, and Webex Calling Dedicated Instance.

2. Network segmentation: Restrict web management interface (port 8443) to administrative subnets only; use firewall ACLs, disable public internet access.

3. Review logs (Jan 21–Feb 02) for anomalous HTTP requests to management interface with encoded or shell-like payloads; check for unauthorized administrative accounts created.

4. No workarounds exist—patching is the only mitigation; prioritize as CISA Tier 0.

---

CVE-2026-22218 & CVE-2026-22219 — Chainlit AI Framework File Read + SSRF (ChainLeak)

Chainlit, the Python framework for building LLM-powered conversational apps, embeds two high-severity flaws: arbitrary file read via path traversal and server-side request forgery via URL parameter injection. An authenticated attacker reads /proc/self/environ (leaking database credentials, AWS keys, internal paths), or triggers SSRF against AWS metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254) to steal IAM role credentials. Combined: source code exfiltration, lateral movement to S3, and CI/CD pipeline compromise. The “authenticated” requirement is misleading—if Chainlit is deployed with default authentication or weak API key validation, exploitation is trivial.

How this shows up in SAST/SCA/DAST/IAST

• SCA: Identify Chainlit versions < 2.9.4 in Python dependency trees and container images; flag as high-risk if deployed internet-facing.

• DAST: Test /project/element endpoint with path traversal payloads (../../etc/passwd); test URL parameter with internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, AWS metadata) to detect SSRF.

• IAST: Instrument Chainlit QA; monitor file I/O and HTTP client operations; trace whether user-supplied paths/URLs reach file system or network operations without validation.

Remediation for Monday

1. Upgrade to Chainlit 2.9.4+ (released Dec 24, 2025); treat < 2.9.4 as actively exploitable.

2. Deploy internal-only: Chainlit should never be internet-exposed; place behind corporate VPN, authentication proxy, or private network.

3. Rotate cloud credentials (AWS, GCP, Azure) used by Chainlit; audit S3 buckets for unauthorized access logs (Jan 19–Feb 02).

4. Container hardening: Run Chainlit in restricted containers with limited system call access (seccomp, AppArmor), read-only filesystems where possible.

5. Log audit: Search application logs for suspicious /project/element requests with path parameters or unusual URL values.

---

Microsoft January Patch Tuesday — 115 Vulnerabilities (8 Critical RCEs)

Microsoft’s January 2026 update is the year’s opening salvo: 115 vulnerabilities, including one actively exploited zero-day (CVE-2026-20805, DWM information disclosure) and six critical RCEs in Windows Graphics, NTFS, RRAS, and Kernel components. The threat pattern: elevation of privilege (57 patches, 50%) is the dominant attack chain—attackers gain initial foothold via phishing/lateral movement, then weaponize these EoP vulns to reach SYSTEM. CVE-2026-20822 (Graphics Component use-after-free), CVE-2026-20840/20922 (NTFS heap overflows), and CVE-2026-20860 (Ancillary Function Driver type confusion) all require authenticated access but reliably escalate to SYSTEM if race conditions are won. For DevSecOps: these patches are mandatory for any Windows-facing infrastructure, especially RRAS (remote access), SharePoint, and internal management servers.

How this shows up in SAST/SCA/DAST/IAST

• SCA: Windows dependency and OS component scanning automatically flags unpatched systems; map to CMDB/asset inventory to identify which applications/services depend on vulnerable components.

• DAST: External scanning of internet-facing RRAS, SharePoint, Office web services can detect misconfigured endpoints; internal tests should verify authentication is enforced on all sensitive interfaces.

• IAST: Instrumented QA on Windows services (SharePoint workflows, RRAS connections, Office add-ins) can reveal dangerous behaviors exploitable via these RCEs (e.g., unsafe memory operations, heap manipulation).

Remediation for Monday

1. Prioritize internet-facing servers: RRAS, SharePoint, Office web services → deploy January patches within 48 hours; treat CVE-2026-20805 as CISA Tier 0 (remediation deadline Feb 3).

2. Asset inventory sync: Wire SCA into CMDB; query “which services run Windows Graphics Component / NTFS?” to rapidly identify downstream risk.

3. Privilege escalation hardening: Audit privileged account access logs; enable Windows Event Tracing for Process Creation (EID 4688) to detect exploitation attempts.

4. Test in pre-prod before broad rollout to catch application compatibility issues; plan phased rollout for 7–14 days.

---

Fortinet FortiWeb CVE-2025-64446 — Path Traversal Authentication Bypass (CVSS 9.8)

Fortinet’s FortiWeb WAF harbors a critical path traversal flaw where unauthenticated attackers craft HTTP POST requests to /api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi to create new administrative accounts on exposed devices. Active exploitation detected since October 2025; PoC is public. For DevSecOps: FortiWeb sits at the network edge protecting internal services—a compromised WAF becomes the attacker’s pivot point to internal infrastructure. This is textbook supply-chain leverage.

How this shows up in SAST/SCA/DAST/IAST

• SCA: Inventory all FortiWeb versions; flag 7.4.0–7.4.9, 7.6.0–7.6.4, 8.0.0 as vulnerable.

• DAST: Scan FortiWeb management interface (usually 8443/TCP) for the path traversal endpoint; test account creation payload.

• Network scanning: Use port scans + banner grabbing to identify exposed FortiWeb instances across perimeter.

Remediation for Monday

1. Upgrade to FortiWeb 8.0.2+ immediately; no workarounds exist.

2. Remove management interface from public internet: Use firewall ACLs to restrict management access (8443/TCP) to trusted administrator subnets only.

3. Audit logs for unauthorized administrative account creation (Jan–Feb); check for “admin” users created with unusual timestamps.

4. Rotate FortiWeb admin passwords and invalidate any API tokens.

---

How SAST, SCA, DAST, IAST Fit Together (Farath’s Feb Playbook)

This fortnight’s vulns map cleanly to the four-pillar defense strategy. Here’s how Farath would operationalize the remediation:

Build Phase (SAST + SCA)

• SAST: Inject rules for improper input validation (n8n expression injection, Chainlit path traversal, Cisco HTTP parameter injection). Flag unsafe file I/O, shell invocations, network calls without validation.

• SCA: Enforce gating on vulnerable n8n (< 1.121.0), Chainlit (< 2.9.4), Fortinet products (< 8.0.2). Block builds that embed known-exploited CVEs (CVE-2026-21858, CVE-2026-22218, CVE-2026-20045 in Docker images).

• Policy: Fail the build if SCA detects CISA Tier 0 vulnerabilities; enable urgent patch workflows that bypass normal release gates.

Deploy Phase (DAST + IAST)

• DAST: Post-patch, run targeted scans against n8n webhook endpoints, Cisco UC management interfaces, Chainlit /project/element. Verify authentication is enforced, input validation blocks payloads.

• IAST: In pre-prod, instrument QA runs on Windows services (SharePoint, RRAS), Cisco UC, and Chainlit deployments. Monitor for exploitation patterns (unsafe memory ops, injection points, SSRF payloads).

Operate Phase (Metrics + Inventory)

• Asset inventory (CMDB): Map every instance of n8n, Chainlit, Cisco UC, Fortinet FortiWeb, and Windows services to a team/owner. SCA and DAST feed continuous risk scores.

• MTTR metric: Track mean time to remediate exploited CVEs (Tier 0: 24 hours target; Tier 1: 7 days).

• Build-to-patch velocity: % of builds blocked by SCA for unpatched components; aim for < 5% bypass rate (higher = policy leakage).

• Alert SLA: SAST/SCA findings should reach dev teams within 4 hours of commit; medium/high severity DAST findings remediated within 48 hours.

---

---

Closing Playbook: Incident Response for Exploited Zero-Days (Feb 2026)

If you discover n8n, Cisco UC, or Chainlit exploitation in your environment:

1. Isolate: Network-segment the affected system; preserve logs.

2. Triage: Assume compromise if CVE-2026-21858 (n8n) or CVE-2026-20045 (Cisco) exploitation is detected; initiate incident response.

3. Rotate: All credentials, API keys, OAuth tokens reachable from the compromised system.

4. Hunt: Query SIEM for lateral movement (child processes, remote logons, unusual network connections from the compromised host).

5. Communicate: Alert upstream dependencies (if n8n was in CI/CD, notify all teams whose artifacts it touched; if Cisco UC was compromised, notify all voice users).

6. Harden: Patch, re-deploy, re-segment network; place behind authentication proxy; enable logging.

---

Thanks for reading Farath’s Code Security Brief! This fortnight underscores that no single tool wins—SAST catches coding flaws early, SCA flags known-exploited components before they ship, DAST validates patches post-deployment, and IAST traces real data flows through vulnerable code in QA. Wire them together with clear ownership and SLAs, and you’ve got a defense-in-depth posture that moves faster than attackers.

Catch the next brief Feb 16 (Feb 2-16 vulns). Share if this cut through the noise.

Stay secure, ship fast. 🚀

With ❤️,
farath at code security briefs

LinkedIn: Farath’s AppSec Insights